Category talk:Standard BattleMechs
Sarna News
- Crashing 'Mechs With Jennifer Brozek, Author Of The Rogue Academy Trilogy
- Getting The Word Out With Rem Alternis, Catalyst Community & Marketing Director
- Bad 'Mechs - Yeoman
- Your BattleTech News Round-Up For February, 2024
- Keeping BattleTech Consistent - An Interview Eric Salzman, Fact-Check Director At CGL
- Read more →
Deletion?[edit]
Both categories under this one are also marked for deletion, and there has been some pushback over the last couple years on that point. I am not seeing a strong consensus for deletion, I am seeing a consistent dislike of the idea. I vote no on deletion.
That said, I do feel that this category should only hold other categories: Akuma is both under this category and Category:Inner Sphere Standard BattleMechs. That's redundant, and if there is a consensus backing it, I am willing to volunteer my time to removing the redundant categories. If we find any little exceptions that don't quite fit either we can worry about that later.--Talvin (talk) 10:59, 21 June 2022 (EDT)
- I think the fact that it's been "under discussion" for 4 years—with no discussion—allows you to remove the tag. As for making it a meta category, I strongly recommend you reach out to Dmon, as he's a big proponent (& engine) of meta categories.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 16:32, 22 June 2022 (EDT)
- Category talk:Inner Sphere Standard BattleMechs kinda blew up, and I am working on bringing these disparate conversations to BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs. Please stand by. :) --Talvin (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2022 (EDT)
- Let's move this over to BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs as it is part of a much larger debate.--Talvin (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2022 (EDT)