Talk:Manufacturing Timeline
Sarna News
- Bad ‘Mechs - Sentinel
- HEXTECH Review - Wave 3 Brings More Urban Options To Your Battlefield
- Your BattleTech News Round-Up For March, 2024
- Crashing 'Mechs With Jennifer Brozek, Author Of The Rogue Academy Trilogy
- Getting The Word Out With Rem Alternis, Catalyst Community & Marketing Director
- Read more →
Contents
Yen-Lo-Wang and the like
I'm wondering if it would be worth the effort to mention the Yen-Lo-Wang and other such pilot-specific variants in the timeline, seeing as how most of them are one-off custom variants. Same goes for variants from the XTROs; are they production 'mechs or one-off customs? Onisuzume 12:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Apocryphal units/equipment
I'm not sure if it would be a good idea to add apocryphal units or equipment to the timeline. It wouldn't be too much work to add them, although it might get confusing when it comes to canonicity. Currently I think that it would be wise 'not' to add them. Opinions? Onisuzume 12:40, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- I both agree and disagree with you. Agree per the reasons you provide, but disagree because each apocryphal article should be boldly tagged with that statement. Doesn't hurt to leave them off, though.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 13:49, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
References
I think when i add some ref. notes to conten, the page blowes up, i don't do this ;), i think the posted links works very usefull.--Doneve 20:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Table Question
I want to revamp the page, some response if you like the known outfit, or if you want to look on tables on the site, (not the standard wiki tables).--Doneve 20:37, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Major revamp
I want to use the MUL site to correct the manufacturing timeline, it's a cannon source and works in that place.--Doneve 20:05, 2 February 2012 (PST)