Editing Talk:Baker 3
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 5:
Line 5: Has anyone seen a canon use of the Roman numeral III for the subject of this article? Volt is updating the SUC Kit to match our policy of system articles vice planets and is asking the question. Preliminary review of the sources provided here, so far, has only returned the Arabic, which contrasts with the near-consistent use of Ruman numerals for other worlds. My default position is that the system is named Baker 3, rather than as a designation of the third world orbiting the system.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 22:32, 24 August 2017 (EDT) Has anyone seen a canon use of the Roman numeral III for the subject of this article? Volt is updating the SUC Kit to match our policy of system articles vice planets and is asking the question. Preliminary review of the sources provided here, so far, has only returned the Arabic, which contrasts with the near-consistent use of Ruman numerals for other worlds. My default position is that the system is named Baker 3, rather than as a designation of the third world orbiting the system.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 22:32, 24 August 2017 (EDT) :Agree. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 01:27, 25 August 2017 (EDT) :Agree. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 01:27, 25 August 2017 (EDT) − ::Seconded. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 14:43, 25 August 2017 (EDT)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Has anyone seen a canon use of the Roman numeral III for the subject of this article? Volt is updating the SUC Kit to match our policy of system articles vice planets and is asking the question. Preliminary review of the sources provided here, so far, has only returned the Arabic, which contrasts with the near-consistent use of Ruman numerals for other worlds. My default position is that the system is named Baker 3, rather than as a designation of the third world orbiting the system.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 22:32, 24 August 2017 (EDT) | Has anyone seen a canon use of the Roman numeral III for the subject of this article? Volt is updating the SUC Kit to match our policy of system articles vice planets and is asking the question. Preliminary review of the sources provided here, so far, has only returned the Arabic, which contrasts with the near-consistent use of Ruman numerals for other worlds. My default position is that the system is named Baker 3, rather than as a designation of the third world orbiting the system.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 22:32, 24 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
:Agree. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 01:27, 25 August 2017 (EDT) | :Agree. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 01:27, 25 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||