Editing Talk:Dezgra
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 2:
Line 2: Perhaps this page should be moved to the [[Dictionary]]? -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 10:39, 30 July 2013 (PDT) Perhaps this page should be moved to the [[Dictionary]]? -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 10:39, 30 July 2013 (PDT) :Personally, I'd rather do it the other way round and move items from the dictionary article into their own articles. At least for nouns. In the case of non-noun words like dezgra I don't feel strong for or against summarily putting them onto a list. The only reason why I don't positively agree with you is the article about [[dispossessed]], I suppose. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2013 (PDT) :Personally, I'd rather do it the other way round and move items from the dictionary article into their own articles. At least for nouns. In the case of non-noun words like dezgra I don't feel strong for or against summarily putting them onto a list. The only reason why I don't positively agree with you is the article about [[dispossessed]], I suppose. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2013 (PDT) − ::I'm not sure where I stand on the dictionary anymore; it would be nice to have all that info in one place, but it is all scattered, and there is debate over many words whether they should be put into it or removed from it. This leads me to think that they should be put back to their own separate pages for simplicities sake. Even short terms like titles could have their own page (a list of rulers with the title could be listed). Just pondering... -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 07:37, 31 July 2013 (PDT)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Perhaps this page should be moved to the [[Dictionary]]? -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 10:39, 30 July 2013 (PDT) | Perhaps this page should be moved to the [[Dictionary]]? -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 10:39, 30 July 2013 (PDT) | ||
:Personally, I'd rather do it the other way round and move items from the dictionary article into their own articles. At least for nouns. In the case of non-noun words like dezgra I don't feel strong for or against summarily putting them onto a list. The only reason why I don't positively agree with you is the article about [[dispossessed]], I suppose. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2013 (PDT) | :Personally, I'd rather do it the other way round and move items from the dictionary article into their own articles. At least for nouns. In the case of non-noun words like dezgra I don't feel strong for or against summarily putting them onto a list. The only reason why I don't positively agree with you is the article about [[dispossessed]], I suppose. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2013 (PDT) | ||
| − | |||