Discussion: Edit

Editing Talk:Timeline

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 16: Line 16:
 
==2010 Austrialia==
 
==2010 Austrialia==
 
Doneve, added this note of Austrialia expains its neutrality.  Since he has some issues with english, i'm not entirely sure where it came from.  I was only able to clarify its not Austrialia the planet which he was linking the entry to.  Does anyone know where he getting this from.  I used to have the BattleSpace source book, it used to have expanded pre-Terra Alliance timeline.  I'm not sure if where this information is coming from.
 
Doneve, added this note of Austrialia expains its neutrality.  Since he has some issues with english, i'm not entirely sure where it came from.  I was only able to clarify its not Austrialia the planet which he was linking the entry to.  Does anyone know where he getting this from.  I used to have the BattleSpace source book, it used to have expanded pre-Terra Alliance timeline.  I'm not sure if where this information is coming from.
 
 
== Question to timeline and yearlist ==
 
 
Hy I adding in last time some stuff to the timeline and yearlist....I think the organisation structure of the timeline and yearlist sites can be updated...in right date times(i hope it is the right word) and give the site a structure!?!? What are you think or the other members....????
 
....support or ideas... I want to talk the other member, what they are thinking about.
 
 
I want to do this work....but it is a lot to do...!!
 
Greetings [[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 15:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 
 
== Manufacturing Timeline? ==
 
 
Might I suggest adding a second timeline dedicated to the appearances of the various equipment and 'Mech variants? This would mean less clutter on the main timeline, while providing a clearer picture of what was available in a given era. [[User:Onisuzume|Onisuzume]] 11:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 
:The article is far too long. It definitely needs to be thinned out. I'm on board for this. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 22:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 
 
:I question if we even need this article, since the Year pages account are also active and seem to be better segregated and utilized. To be honest, I had forgotten we have it, in the first place. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 
 
::Granted, the year pages are also fine pages, but aren't very easy to see the bigger picture with.
 
::So I'll see what I can do then, but at the moment I'm busy sorting out which units/variants existed from Pre-Spaceflight till 2840 using the master unit names list v1.66(1.67?). And smeg, I already have over four hundred variants/models. For now I'll be leaving models/variants without a listed year out of the list, so someone will have to go over the RS for them and compare it with the used equipment. [[User:Onisuzume|Onisuzume]] 13:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 
 
:::Keep in mind that with increased visibility will come increased attention from people who may not be clear on the direction the page is headed, so it will need someone willing to 'clean' it up and good with explaining why reversions were made, etc. Good luck. I can see how it could be a resource when completed. We should find a way to tie it in to the 'Mech portal, so it gets visibility.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 14:53, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 
 
::::Well, I've decided to ''Be Bold'' and go ahead and started the page. [[User:Onisuzume|Onisuzume]] 19:25, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::Great Job --[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 19:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 
 
::::Onisuzume, it really needs references. I know it seems burdensome, but if you use the <code><nowiki><ref name=xxx></nowiki></code> method, it'll be cleaner and faster, and then it'll have verifiable value. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 03:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 
 
Any plan to include timeline information about the Aurigan Reach from the new Battletech game?
 
:If it ever becomes canon.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 18:04, 11 July 2018 (EDT)
 
 
== Decree of Retension ==
 
 
Retension isn't a word and I can't find the original through a Windows Explorer search. It looks like it should be Decree of Retention. Does anyone know? [[User:Madness Divine|Madness Divine]] ([[User talk:Madness Divine|talk]]) 13:45, 31 August 2022 (EDT)
 
 
== Raymond Cameron's Death ==
 
The timeline implies that Raymond was killed by his brother but none of the associated pages agree.  Is this in error and/or a supposition?
 
:This article has a serious lack of citations, and being a "timeline" article, is very likely one of the oldest articles on the entire wiki. Because of those two factors, assume the worst and consider it possibly fanon nonsense until proven otherwise.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 19:11, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
 

Please note that all contributions to BattleTechWiki are considered to be released under the GNU FDL 1.2 (see BattleTechWiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Advanced templates:

Editing: {{Merge}}   {{Moratorium}}   {{Otheruses| | | }}

Notices: {{NoEdit}}   {{Sign}}   {{Unsigned|name}}   {{Welcome}}

Administration: {{Essay}}   {{Policy}}   {{Procedure}}