Editing User:Frabby
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 163:
Line 163: My notable exploits during the time on the MUSE included losing 3 ''[[Griffin]]''s in a row in ill-fated attempts to prove the design's superiority on the battlefield, later faring surprisingly well piloting a ''[[Crusader]]'' (a design I don't like) and eventually getting assigned a ''[[Cataphract]]'', but never the ''Archer'' I always asked for. Despite merely mediocre combat performance (or perhaps because this was still better than than the average Liao MechWarrior) I was promoted to Subcommander, drafted into Warrior House Imarra against my wishes and given command of a Lance that had never seen combat action by the time I had to quit the game. My notable exploits during the time on the MUSE included losing 3 ''[[Griffin]]''s in a row in ill-fated attempts to prove the design's superiority on the battlefield, later faring surprisingly well piloting a ''[[Crusader]]'' (a design I don't like) and eventually getting assigned a ''[[Cataphract]]'', but never the ''Archer'' I always asked for. Despite merely mediocre combat performance (or perhaps because this was still better than than the average Liao MechWarrior) I was promoted to Subcommander, drafted into Warrior House Imarra against my wishes and given command of a Lance that had never seen combat action by the time I had to quit the game. + + =Structure of brigade articles and army overall= + Hi, I think all major brigades need an overwork. I find the structure of the field manual is good an I will change every brigade to this structure. Also the army articles need a revision to the better. Tell me, thats my thinkingwrong or right? [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 10:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
My notable exploits during the time on the MUSE included losing 3 ''[[Griffin]]''s in a row in ill-fated attempts to prove the design's superiority on the battlefield, later faring surprisingly well piloting a ''[[Crusader]]'' (a design I don't like) and eventually getting assigned a ''[[Cataphract]]'', but never the ''Archer'' I always asked for. Despite merely mediocre combat performance (or perhaps because this was still better than than the average Liao MechWarrior) I was promoted to Subcommander, drafted into Warrior House Imarra against my wishes and given command of a Lance that had never seen combat action by the time I had to quit the game. | My notable exploits during the time on the MUSE included losing 3 ''[[Griffin]]''s in a row in ill-fated attempts to prove the design's superiority on the battlefield, later faring surprisingly well piloting a ''[[Crusader]]'' (a design I don't like) and eventually getting assigned a ''[[Cataphract]]'', but never the ''Archer'' I always asked for. Despite merely mediocre combat performance (or perhaps because this was still better than than the average Liao MechWarrior) I was promoted to Subcommander, drafted into Warrior House Imarra against my wishes and given command of a Lance that had never seen combat action by the time I had to quit the game. | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Structure of brigade articles and army overall= | ||
| + | Hi, I think all major brigades need an overwork. I find the structure of the field manual is good an I will change every brigade to this structure. Also the army articles need a revision to the better. Tell me, thats my thinkingwrong or right? [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 10:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC) | ||