Difference between revisions of "Talk:Black Knight"
Sarna News
(→Word of Blake: resp.) |
(→Word of Blake: resp) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:: Let me clarify : I believe sufficient circumstantial evidence exists that the Black Knight was used by WoB in significant numbers, even if they weren't actually building new Black Knights. Does that work? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] | :: Let me clarify : I believe sufficient circumstantial evidence exists that the Black Knight was used by WoB in significant numbers, even if they weren't actually building new Black Knights. Does that work? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::The optimist in me wants to say 'yes', especially to such a useful Editor such as yourself. But, as Frabby made clear recently on another issue, we really need to restrict ourselves to 'reporting' rather than 'deciphering'. Rather simply put, if someone disagrees with your analysis and you don't have the straight, cold facts to back it, it detracts from the value of the work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I'd ask you: would such analysis fit better into a discussion on a forum or maybe an [[:Category:BattleTech Essays|essay]]? Or is this something you can state simply in one of our articles, with a reference (or two)? Are you saying 'significant' as defined by just you or does a source (character, in-universe report, etc.) say that? In the last question, the former would be analysis, the latter would be reported. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 20:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:15, 12 March 2010
|
This article is within the scope of the Project BattleMechs, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Word of Blake
Should this fall under WoB category as well? Just look at the Fall of Terra cover. ClanWolverine101
- It would have to be referenced somewhere that is is a Blakist 'Mech. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 12:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Let me clarify : I believe sufficient circumstantial evidence exists that the Black Knight was used by WoB in significant numbers, even if they weren't actually building new Black Knights. Does that work? ClanWolverine101
- The optimist in me wants to say 'yes', especially to such a useful Editor such as yourself. But, as Frabby made clear recently on another issue, we really need to restrict ourselves to 'reporting' rather than 'deciphering'. Rather simply put, if someone disagrees with your analysis and you don't have the straight, cold facts to back it, it detracts from the value of the work.
- I'd ask you: would such analysis fit better into a discussion on a forum or maybe an essay? Or is this something you can state simply in one of our articles, with a reference (or two)? Are you saying 'significant' as defined by just you or does a source (character, in-universe report, etc.) say that? In the last question, the former would be analysis, the latter would be reported. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 20:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)