Difference between revisions of "Talk:Peter Steiner-Davion"

(Debate: Brotherhood of Cincinnatus)
(Cincinnatus Reference Found!)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Brotherhood of Cincinnatus: With respect, using an offhand line from an interview, even when uttered by a PTB, as basis for canon is in my opinion suspect at best. I feel that the only things stated as "fact" should be from published "in universe" material, such as a House Book or the new Hot Spots books.
 
Brotherhood of Cincinnatus: With respect, using an offhand line from an interview, even when uttered by a PTB, as basis for canon is in my opinion suspect at best. I feel that the only things stated as "fact" should be from published "in universe" material, such as a House Book or the new Hot Spots books.
 +
 +
MajorTom
 +
 +
----
 +
Brought this up on the CBT boards and Roosterboy was able to come up with the actual, in-universe source: MWDA sourcebook ''Technology of Destruction''. Will re-edit all three changed entries (Peter, Adam, and Lyran Alliance). My mistake, just want to make sure everything is accurate.
  
 
MajorTom
 
MajorTom

Revision as of 23:03, 29 May 2008

Bio.gif This article is within the scope of the Project Characters, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of Characters. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Bio.gif



Brotherhood of Cincinnatus: With respect, using an offhand line from an interview, even when uttered by a PTB, as basis for canon is in my opinion suspect at best. I feel that the only things stated as "fact" should be from published "in universe" material, such as a House Book or the new Hot Spots books.

MajorTom


Brought this up on the CBT boards and Roosterboy was able to come up with the actual, in-universe source: MWDA sourcebook Technology of Destruction. Will re-edit all three changed entries (Peter, Adam, and Lyran Alliance). My mistake, just want to make sure everything is accurate.

MajorTom