Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Events"
(Classification status progress.) |
(Final status report.) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
** [[Fortress Republic]] | ** [[Fortress Republic]] | ||
--[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 20:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC) | --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 20:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | : It looks like I managed to finish classifying the articles. I have only left the timelines in the Events master category, since I see no need to create a separate sub-category for them. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 08:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:50, 28 August 2011
It would be desirable to move all articles that belongs to Category:Events into sub-categories. I have started doing so. --Neufeld 12:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- That sounds fine. Thanks for that level of clean-up work.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 15:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Classification progress report
Right now there are ten articles left in the main Event category:
- Two timelines. Create a master Timeline Category, keep them here, or lump them with the year pages?
- Two articles waiting for the final name of the atrocities category.
- Five articles whose quality is so low that that they might need an urgent revamp or deletion.
- Stewart War - Lack of context.
- Ruchbach Annexation - Sub-stub quality.
- Exodus (2242) - Sub-stub quality.
- Naval Battle over Oriente - Total lack of context.
- Draconis Combine Invasion - Very badly named.
- One that probably should be a faction instead.
--Neufeld 20:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- It looks like I managed to finish classifying the articles. I have only left the timelines in the Events master category, since I see no need to create a separate sub-category for them. --Neufeld 08:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)