Difference between revisions of "Talk:2nd Republican Guards"
Sarna News
(cleanup) |
m (Clean up/respon) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Cleanup== | ==Cleanup== | ||
This page needs a good solid review of articles (a, an, the, etc.), as well as exisiting capitalizations. On the plus side, it has good solid information on the unit. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 16:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | This page needs a good solid review of articles (a, an, the, etc.), as well as exisiting capitalizations. On the plus side, it has good solid information on the unit. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 16:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Hello Rev, I did extensive research on this unit. Each piece of information as solid as granite. I realize my spelling and grammer is something to be desired, however i'm not sure why you feel the unit's information isn't solid. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 19:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:07, 21 January 2010
Cleanup
This page needs a good solid review of articles (a, an, the, etc.), as well as exisiting capitalizations. On the plus side, it has good solid information on the unit. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 16:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Rev, I did extensive research on this unit. Each piece of information as solid as granite. I realize my spelling and grammer is something to be desired, however i'm not sure why you feel the unit's information isn't solid. -- Wrangler 19:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)