Difference between revisions of "Talk:4th Royal Guards"
(Comment about possible resurrection of the unit.) |
m |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | There is information in Operation Hammerfall of a 4th Royals unit. Thou they never call this unit 4th Royal Guards. It suggests that the unit was resurrected/reformed in years after the Jihad. I need look it up more see if Writers say "4th Royals" is 4th Royal Guards. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 12:25, 22 June 2009 (PDT) | + | {{WikiProject Military Commands|tr=new}} |
+ | There is information in [[Operation Hammerfall]] of a 4th Royals unit. Thou they never call this unit 4th Royal Guards. It suggests that the unit was resurrected/reformed in years after the Jihad. I need look it up more see if Writers say "4th Royals" is 4th Royal Guards. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 12:25, 22 June 2009 (PDT) | ||
+ | :Wrangler, I would argue that if the unit from Hammerfall was Lyran, then its safe to assume they are the same unit (or rebirth of) ...until evidence stating otherwise. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 13:45, 22 June 2009 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 16:13, 18 July 2010
There is information in Operation Hammerfall of a 4th Royals unit. Thou they never call this unit 4th Royal Guards. It suggests that the unit was resurrected/reformed in years after the Jihad. I need look it up more see if Writers say "4th Royals" is 4th Royal Guards. -- Wrangler 12:25, 22 June 2009 (PDT)