Difference between revisions of "Talk:Baltazar III Factory"
m |
(This is a mess. Possible way forward.) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
We need a check of the listed reference to see if there is any mention of Baltazar III. If not, I move this page be deleted as probably fanon, along with the single link to it.--[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 11:46, 29 May 2022 (EDT) | We need a check of the listed reference to see if there is any mention of Baltazar III. If not, I move this page be deleted as probably fanon, along with the single link to it.--[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 11:46, 29 May 2022 (EDT) | ||
: The facility is mentioned in rumors in TRO: Project Phoenix for sure, though as far as I can see only in rumor and innuendo. Unsure where the exact listing of variants is coming from --[[User:RasalhagueLibrarian|RasalhagueLibrarian]] ([[User talk:RasalhagueLibrarian|talk]]) 15:23, 29 May 2022 (EDT) | : The facility is mentioned in rumors in TRO: Project Phoenix for sure, though as far as I can see only in rumor and innuendo. Unsure where the exact listing of variants is coming from --[[User:RasalhagueLibrarian|RasalhagueLibrarian]] ([[User talk:RasalhagueLibrarian|talk]]) 15:23, 29 May 2022 (EDT) | ||
+ | :: So, what I am hearing from here and elsewhere is this, and if I am in error, I hope someone will correct me: | ||
+ | ::* Ostroc and Marauder do not appear at all in TRO:3039. Firestarter variant mentioned here does not appear in that book. Baltazar does not appear in that book. 3039 is, therefore, a false reference. (I intend to remove it.) | ||
+ | ::* We do not have firm info, but [[Canon Rumor]], that the [[Circinus Federation]] had a factory on Baltazar III, with the evidence being Marauder designs in Federation hands. TRO:PP page 48. Also the [[Ostsol]] entry in [[Technical Readout: Project Phoenix]] hints at it without being explicit, I am told. | ||
+ | ::* TRO:3050U hints at CF production of that Firestarter Variant, but production in this facility would seem to be an assumption rather than cited fact. | ||
+ | :: At this point, I think the best we could do is to rewrite this page as a Canon Rumor with what info is available cited, and abandon the standard "What is produced here" format. | ||
+ | ::--[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 17:01, 29 May 2022 (EDT) |
Revision as of 17:01, 29 May 2022
Verify
The PrydeRockIndustries fansite has a lot of stuff spread around the components part of the Wiki. Is this one of them? This page has exactly one reference, for the Targeting-Tracking System (which page GreekFire has thoroughly purged of fanon), and this site is not mentioned in that page at all: the manufacturing site there is on Terra. We need a check of the listed reference to see if there is any mention of Baltazar III. If not, I move this page be deleted as probably fanon, along with the single link to it.--Talvin (talk) 11:46, 29 May 2022 (EDT)
- The facility is mentioned in rumors in TRO: Project Phoenix for sure, though as far as I can see only in rumor and innuendo. Unsure where the exact listing of variants is coming from --RasalhagueLibrarian (talk) 15:23, 29 May 2022 (EDT)
- So, what I am hearing from here and elsewhere is this, and if I am in error, I hope someone will correct me:
- Ostroc and Marauder do not appear at all in TRO:3039. Firestarter variant mentioned here does not appear in that book. Baltazar does not appear in that book. 3039 is, therefore, a false reference. (I intend to remove it.)
- We do not have firm info, but Canon Rumor, that the Circinus Federation had a factory on Baltazar III, with the evidence being Marauder designs in Federation hands. TRO:PP page 48. Also the Ostsol entry in Technical Readout: Project Phoenix hints at it without being explicit, I am told.
- TRO:3050U hints at CF production of that Firestarter Variant, but production in this facility would seem to be an assumption rather than cited fact.
- At this point, I think the best we could do is to rewrite this page as a Canon Rumor with what info is available cited, and abandon the standard "What is produced here" format.
- --Talvin (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2022 (EDT)
- So, what I am hearing from here and elsewhere is this, and if I am in error, I hope someone will correct me: