Difference between revisions of "Talk:BattleTech eras"
Sarna News
(interesting) |
(put into one) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Great idea for an article. I think this woulld be a good addition to the [[BattleTech]] article in the See Also section. Suggestion for another title: '''BattleTech Eras'''? --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 10:13, 28 August 2008 (CDT) | Great idea for an article. I think this woulld be a good addition to the [[BattleTech]] article in the See Also section. Suggestion for another title: '''BattleTech Eras'''? --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 10:13, 28 August 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Do we really need seven different articles for information that is already covered elsewhere? I do like the idea for explaining the eras thing, but shouldn't we just do it in one comprehensive article? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 19:05, 28 August 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:05, 28 August 2008
Great idea for an article. I think this woulld be a good addition to the BattleTech article in the See Also section. Suggestion for another title: BattleTech Eras? --Revanche (talk|contribs) 10:13, 28 August 2008 (CDT)
- Do we really need seven different articles for information that is already covered elsewhere? I do like the idea for explaining the eras thing, but shouldn't we just do it in one comprehensive article? --Scaletail 19:05, 28 August 2008 (CDT)