Editing Talk:Clan Military Structure
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 2:
Line 2: I have heard the terms "Mixed Trinary" and "Mixed Binary" used many times to describe units that use both Points and Stars so i figured i would put them in, if i am wrong and they are just called "Trinary" and "Binary" let me know and i will fix it. [[User:FellBlade|FellBlade]] 23:15, 4 May 2009 (PDT) I have heard the terms "Mixed Trinary" and "Mixed Binary" used many times to describe units that use both Points and Stars so i figured i would put them in, if i am wrong and they are just called "Trinary" and "Binary" let me know and i will fix it. [[User:FellBlade|FellBlade]] 23:15, 4 May 2009 (PDT) :: It's as you said, "Mixed Binary/Trinary" are descriptive terms, with no set definitions. Strategic Ops doesn't list the mixed symbology as official, so it might be an idea to drop them, and add a note to the Binary/Trinary section discussing mixed units. Good work on the rest of the symbols, BTW. [[User:Alkemita|Alkemita]] 07:03, 5 May 2009 (PDT) :: It's as you said, "Mixed Binary/Trinary" are descriptive terms, with no set definitions. Strategic Ops doesn't list the mixed symbology as official, so it might be an idea to drop them, and add a note to the Binary/Trinary section discussing mixed units. Good work on the rest of the symbols, BTW. [[User:Alkemita|Alkemita]] 07:03, 5 May 2009 (PDT) − ::: how about plugging a <nowiki>{{cn}}</nowiki> tag on them? + ::: how about plugging a {{cn}} tag on them? :::: What are we citing? The existence of Mixed Binaries and Trinaries, or the existence of the symbols used to represent them? If the former, I can give you lots of cites from the various Field Manuals. For the latter, ''Strategic Operations'' is the only CBT source I'm aware of that gives echelon symbols for Clan units, and it doesn't show the combined Nova/Star designators that FellBlade's created, hence my suggestion above to drop them and add a note about how a Trinary, for example, could include a Nova [[User:Alkemita|Alkemita]] 17:15, 5 May 2009 (PDT) :::: What are we citing? The existence of Mixed Binaries and Trinaries, or the existence of the symbols used to represent them? If the former, I can give you lots of cites from the various Field Manuals. For the latter, ''Strategic Operations'' is the only CBT source I'm aware of that gives echelon symbols for Clan units, and it doesn't show the combined Nova/Star designators that FellBlade's created, hence my suggestion above to drop them and add a note about how a Trinary, for example, could include a Nova [[User:Alkemita|Alkemita]] 17:15, 5 May 2009 (PDT)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I have heard the terms "Mixed Trinary" and "Mixed Binary" used many times to describe units that use both Points and Stars so i figured i would put them in, if i am wrong and they are just called "Trinary" and "Binary" let me know and i will fix it. [[User:FellBlade|FellBlade]] 23:15, 4 May 2009 (PDT) | I have heard the terms "Mixed Trinary" and "Mixed Binary" used many times to describe units that use both Points and Stars so i figured i would put them in, if i am wrong and they are just called "Trinary" and "Binary" let me know and i will fix it. [[User:FellBlade|FellBlade]] 23:15, 4 May 2009 (PDT) | ||
:: It's as you said, "Mixed Binary/Trinary" are descriptive terms, with no set definitions. Strategic Ops doesn't list the mixed symbology as official, so it might be an idea to drop them, and add a note to the Binary/Trinary section discussing mixed units. Good work on the rest of the symbols, BTW. [[User:Alkemita|Alkemita]] 07:03, 5 May 2009 (PDT) | :: It's as you said, "Mixed Binary/Trinary" are descriptive terms, with no set definitions. Strategic Ops doesn't list the mixed symbology as official, so it might be an idea to drop them, and add a note to the Binary/Trinary section discussing mixed units. Good work on the rest of the symbols, BTW. [[User:Alkemita|Alkemita]] 07:03, 5 May 2009 (PDT) | ||
| − | ::: how about plugging a | + | ::: how about plugging a {{cn}} tag on them? |
:::: What are we citing? The existence of Mixed Binaries and Trinaries, or the existence of the symbols used to represent them? If the former, I can give you lots of cites from the various Field Manuals. For the latter, ''Strategic Operations'' is the only CBT source I'm aware of that gives echelon symbols for Clan units, and it doesn't show the combined Nova/Star designators that FellBlade's created, hence my suggestion above to drop them and add a note about how a Trinary, for example, could include a Nova [[User:Alkemita|Alkemita]] 17:15, 5 May 2009 (PDT) | :::: What are we citing? The existence of Mixed Binaries and Trinaries, or the existence of the symbols used to represent them? If the former, I can give you lots of cites from the various Field Manuals. For the latter, ''Strategic Operations'' is the only CBT source I'm aware of that gives echelon symbols for Clan units, and it doesn't show the combined Nova/Star designators that FellBlade's created, hence my suggestion above to drop them and add a note about how a Trinary, for example, could include a Nova [[User:Alkemita|Alkemita]] 17:15, 5 May 2009 (PDT) | ||