Editing Talk:Revanche/Policy:Essays
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 63:
Line 63:
:::''Makes sense. I've also split writing quality and content up into two dimensions. The reasons for rejecting an article for either would be quite different from the other. All of the dimensions really discuss whether it is a generally desirable item or not, "content" is more specific as to what we mean.'' -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 23:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC) :::''Makes sense. I've also split writing quality and content up into two dimensions. The reasons for rejecting an article for either would be quite different from the other. All of the dimensions really discuss whether it is a generally desirable item or not, "content" is more specific as to what we mean.'' -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 23:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
::::''Some general thoughts: I like and agree with most, maybe all, that's been said here so far. But we're lacking an accurate definition of "Essay" here, somtething that pretty much belongs to the top of the discussion. I''ll see if I can narrow it down in the "Content" section.'' [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 07:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC) ::::''Some general thoughts: I like and agree with most, maybe all, that's been said here so far. But we're lacking an accurate definition of "Essay" here, somtething that pretty much belongs to the top of the discussion. I''ll see if I can narrow it down in the "Content" section.'' [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 07:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
− :::::''The def'n of "Essay" is what is meant to be the focus of the "Format" section, which is yet unwritten.'' -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 19:40, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
==Ownership== ==Ownership==
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
:::''Makes sense. I've also split writing quality and content up into two dimensions. The reasons for rejecting an article for either would be quite different from the other. All of the dimensions really discuss whether it is a generally desirable item or not, "content" is more specific as to what we mean.'' -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 23:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC) | :::''Makes sense. I've also split writing quality and content up into two dimensions. The reasons for rejecting an article for either would be quite different from the other. All of the dimensions really discuss whether it is a generally desirable item or not, "content" is more specific as to what we mean.'' -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 23:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::''Some general thoughts: I like and agree with most, maybe all, that's been said here so far. But we're lacking an accurate definition of "Essay" here, somtething that pretty much belongs to the top of the discussion. I''ll see if I can narrow it down in the "Content" section.'' [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 07:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | ::::''Some general thoughts: I like and agree with most, maybe all, that's been said here so far. But we're lacking an accurate definition of "Essay" here, somtething that pretty much belongs to the top of the discussion. I''ll see if I can narrow it down in the "Content" section.'' [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 07:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
==Ownership== | ==Ownership== |