Editing Template talk:ApocryphalContentStart
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 161:
Line 161:
: Doneve - For articles like that, I suggest we continue to follow the old system. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 00:10, 25 July 2013 (PDT) : Doneve - For articles like that, I suggest we continue to follow the old system. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 00:10, 25 July 2013 (PDT)
::Since I'm working on some of the old BattleTechnology articles, I'll add in my 2 C-bills' worth and suggest we go with the old system. [[User:Nuclear-Fridge|Nuclear-Fridge]] ([[User talk:Nuclear-Fridge|talk]]) 04:50, 14 May 2014 (PDT) ::Since I'm working on some of the old BattleTechnology articles, I'll add in my 2 C-bills' worth and suggest we go with the old system. [[User:Nuclear-Fridge|Nuclear-Fridge]] ([[User talk:Nuclear-Fridge|talk]]) 04:50, 14 May 2014 (PDT)
− :::To clarify: The begin/end tags are '''only''' supposed to go into articles that mix fully canonical content with apocryphal information, and where the apocryphal information consequently has to be segregated.
− :::Articles about entirely apocryphal subjects are to be tagged with the ApocryphalArticle tag. No change here.
− :::(The idea was to make the situation clearer in cases where there is a mix of canonical and apocryphal information, as people felt an apocryphal tag at the header of a largely canonical article did not feel right.) [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 06:46, 14 May 2014 (PDT)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
: Doneve - For articles like that, I suggest we continue to follow the old system. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 00:10, 25 July 2013 (PDT) | : Doneve - For articles like that, I suggest we continue to follow the old system. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 00:10, 25 July 2013 (PDT) | ||
::Since I'm working on some of the old BattleTechnology articles, I'll add in my 2 C-bills' worth and suggest we go with the old system. [[User:Nuclear-Fridge|Nuclear-Fridge]] ([[User talk:Nuclear-Fridge|talk]]) 04:50, 14 May 2014 (PDT) | ::Since I'm working on some of the old BattleTechnology articles, I'll add in my 2 C-bills' worth and suggest we go with the old system. [[User:Nuclear-Fridge|Nuclear-Fridge]] ([[User talk:Nuclear-Fridge|talk]]) 04:50, 14 May 2014 (PDT) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− |