Editing Template talk:InfoBoxMilitaryCommand
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 37:
Line 37:
* Disbanded * Disbanded
* Parent Command * Parent Command
− * Sub-Commands + * Sub-commands
Is what I am thinking, possibly move affiliation down to between disbanded and parent command. I did the first one with the loose info blocks as "who are they" = designations, "Who do they work for" = affiliation and the parent command, "when" =formed and disbanded.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 05:52, 25 March 2019 (EDT) Is what I am thinking, possibly move affiliation down to between disbanded and parent command. I did the first one with the loose info blocks as "who are they" = designations, "Who do they work for" = affiliation and the parent command, "when" =formed and disbanded.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 05:52, 25 March 2019 (EDT)
::Just one thing. Once we are clear which is the best template to use, can you please share it somewhere in the Home/News section so all editors are aware?--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 14:47, 29 April 2019 (EDT) ::Just one thing. Once we are clear which is the best template to use, can you please share it somewhere in the Home/News section so all editors are aware?--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 14:47, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
* Disbanded | * Disbanded | ||
* Parent Command | * Parent Command | ||
− | * Sub- | + | * Sub-commands |
Is what I am thinking, possibly move affiliation down to between disbanded and parent command. I did the first one with the loose info blocks as "who are they" = designations, "Who do they work for" = affiliation and the parent command, "when" =formed and disbanded.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 05:52, 25 March 2019 (EDT) | Is what I am thinking, possibly move affiliation down to between disbanded and parent command. I did the first one with the loose info blocks as "who are they" = designations, "Who do they work for" = affiliation and the parent command, "when" =formed and disbanded.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 05:52, 25 March 2019 (EDT) | ||
::Just one thing. Once we are clear which is the best template to use, can you please share it somewhere in the Home/News section so all editors are aware?--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 14:47, 29 April 2019 (EDT) | ::Just one thing. Once we are clear which is the best template to use, can you please share it somewhere in the Home/News section so all editors are aware?--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 14:47, 29 April 2019 (EDT) |