Discussion: Edit

Editing User talk:Cease to Hope

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 10: Line 10:
 
:As for the indmech-specific parameters, no articles actually used BAR. It would be easy to add to InfoBoxBattleMech if it's important to you. I did add support for other industrialmech-specific fields, like Use, Equipment, and Equipment Rating.
 
:As for the indmech-specific parameters, no articles actually used BAR. It would be easy to add to InfoBoxBattleMech if it's important to you. I did add support for other industrialmech-specific fields, like Use, Equipment, and Equipment Rating.
 
:I don't especially care what the template is named. As long as you fix the double-redirects, you can rename it to whatever you'd like. [[User:Cease to Hope|Cease to Hope]] ([[User talk:Cease to Hope|talk]]) 21:56, 13 September 2017 (EDT)
 
:I don't especially care what the template is named. As long as you fix the double-redirects, you can rename it to whatever you'd like. [[User:Cease to Hope|Cease to Hope]] ([[User talk:Cease to Hope|talk]]) 21:56, 13 September 2017 (EDT)
::Ok, fair enough. I hadn't realized that the BAR field wasn't used. And you're right in that it makes no sense to keep separate infoboxes if they aren't used any differently.
+
::Ok, fair enough. I hadn't realized that the BAR field wasn't used. And you're tight in that it makes no sense to keep separate infoboxes if they aren't used any differently.
 
::About renaming the InfoBoxBattleMech, while it may not be the most important thing under the sun, the concern remains that it is a misleading misnomer. I'll probably move the infobox template to the new name at some point (with a redirect in place of course). No worries. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 17:57, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
 
::About renaming the InfoBoxBattleMech, while it may not be the most important thing under the sun, the concern remains that it is a misleading misnomer. I'll probably move the infobox template to the new name at some point (with a redirect in place of course). No worries. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 17:57, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
 
::::Is there way we can fix this soon? I'm rather upset infobox is messed up.  I don't like seeing Medium Industrial mechs listed by category as BattleMech.  I rather be manually entering category info is this is a problem that isn't being addressed.  [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 17:34, 28 October 2017 (EDT) --
 
::::Is there way we can fix this soon? I'm rather upset infobox is messed up.  I don't like seeing Medium Industrial mechs listed by category as BattleMech.  I rather be manually entering category info is this is a problem that isn't being addressed.  [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 17:34, 28 October 2017 (EDT) --

Please note that all contributions to BattleTechWiki are considered to be released under the GNU FDL 1.2 (see BattleTechWiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Advanced templates:

Editing: {{Merge}}   {{Moratorium}}   {{Otheruses| | | }}

Notices: {{NoEdit}}   {{Sign}}   {{Unsigned|name}}   {{Welcome}}

Administration: {{Essay}}   {{Policy}}   {{Procedure}}