Difference between revisions of "Talk:Itabaiana"
Sarna News
(more info) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Oooh, check [http://www.classicbattletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,35782.msg877561.html#msg877561 this] out, plus the next post after it. The name confusion may be intentional. Also nice for your notes section: all three posts provide other sources discussing the planet. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 19:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC) | :Oooh, check [http://www.classicbattletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,35782.msg877561.html#msg877561 this] out, plus the next post after it. The name confusion may be intentional. Also nice for your notes section: all three posts provide other sources discussing the planet. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 19:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Well, a rename would only be needed if they make up their mind and tell us what the official name is. As is, a Notes section and redirect is probably going to be needed, if just to discuss the issue so people know why it's named that particular way | ||
Revision as of 15:47, 26 March 2010
Name spelling
There seems to be some confusion of the proper name of this planet through the various Battletech sourcebooks. Some of them call the planet 'Itabiana', but most of them seem to point to Itabaiana being the proper name. Masters and Minions, the last print sourcebook we've received, points to it as being 'Itabaiana' on 154. --Istal devalis 19:04, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- ID, I think this warrants a ==Notes== section, to discuss just that. And, as M&M is the latest source, are you advocating a page title change? --Revanche (talk|contribs) 19:21, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oooh, check this out, plus the next post after it. The name confusion may be intentional. Also nice for your notes section: all three posts provide other sources discussing the planet. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 19:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Well, a rename would only be needed if they make up their mind and tell us what the official name is. As is, a Notes section and redirect is probably going to be needed, if just to discuss the issue so people know why it's named that particular way