Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Update needed"
Sarna News
m (resp) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: To go into more detail it seems that there are weekly edits needing reverts on pages flagged Update Needed while under moratorium. I'm afraid that these reverts are driving away potential new editors. There was even one who left an angry note on a page some days ago. Adding mention on moratorium back into this template would probably result in less people getting pissed off at us. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 18:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | : To go into more detail it seems that there are weekly edits needing reverts on pages flagged Update Needed while under moratorium. I'm afraid that these reverts are driving away potential new editors. There was even one who left an angry note on a page some days ago. Adding mention on moratorium back into this template would probably result in less people getting pissed off at us. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 18:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Mbear is in work with this problem.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 18:42, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | ::Mbear is in work with this problem.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 18:42, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Moratorium message has been added to template.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]] 19:11, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:11, 7 October 2010
Could we add back the mention of the moratorium period, please? --Neufeld 18:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- To go into more detail it seems that there are weekly edits needing reverts on pages flagged Update Needed while under moratorium. I'm afraid that these reverts are driving away potential new editors. There was even one who left an angry note on a page some days ago. Adding mention on moratorium back into this template would probably result in less people getting pissed off at us. --Neufeld 18:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)