Difference between revisions of "User talk:Nicjansma"
m (→Layout) |
(→Layout: clarification) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::::I would prefer to keep the previous layout, where two equals (==) are used for headings. This corresponds with an H2 HTML tag. One equal (=) is a H1 HTML tag, which should be reserved for the page title. [[User:Nicjansma|Nicjansma]] ([[User talk:Nicjansma|talk]]) 08:15, 7 November 2013 (PST) | ::::I would prefer to keep the previous layout, where two equals (==) are used for headings. This corresponds with an H2 HTML tag. One equal (=) is a H1 HTML tag, which should be reserved for the page title. [[User:Nicjansma|Nicjansma]] ([[User talk:Nicjansma|talk]]) 08:15, 7 November 2013 (PST) | ||
:::::Ok, Mbear give me a CSS code and it works then i have the layout i want.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 14:44, 7 November 2013 (PST) | :::::Ok, Mbear give me a CSS code and it works then i have the layout i want.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 14:44, 7 November 2013 (PST) | ||
+ | ::::::Nic, it's not about using H1s instead of H2s, it's about changing what H2s look like. Rather than just being an underline, the Wikipedia formatting uses a hairline that runs the width of the page. I think it increases readability. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] ([[User talk:Scaletail|talk]]) 18:33, 7 November 2013 (PST) |
Revision as of 22:33, 7 November 2013
Archive
Talk Archives:
Current
Broken Link
I noticed that the MUX link on the left navigation bar is broken and links to a deleted page, so the link on the side should also be removed. -BobTheZombie (talk) 21:33, 6 October 2013 (PDT)
- I hope to create a small page that talks about the old-school (and current) MUX/MUSEs soon. Nicjansma (talk) 13:54, 16 October 2013 (PDT)
Sarna.net Design Refresh
August 20, 2013: The new visuals are live for all of Sarna. Please let me know if you have any feedback. There's additional talk about the refresh in the 2013 Archive.Nicjansma (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2013 (PDT)
Layout
Hy Nic i copyied this talk from Mbears talk page, please give us a statement about the new layout on the various Combat Vehicle pages, if it works or not or ideas.
Hi Mbear, can you take a look on the Heimdall (Combat Vehicle) page i changed the headers a little bit, my feeling is it looks much better and has a cleaner overview as our standard formating, what do you think? Ok iam be bold the new layout looks great, if it not become acceptance i revert me changes.--Doneve (talk) 16:48, 29 October 2013 (PDT)
- I for one don't like the new layout, because it makes the headings as big as the title, which just looks wrong to me. Additionally, Wikipedia uses the two == layout and it works quite well. That's just my opinion; we need more people to chime in. -BobTheZombie (talk) 20:06, 29 October 2013 (PDT)
- There is no problem, we can change the headings size for the new layout, but a admin must do this, oh Bob the arcticle name size and the new heading size is the same, or iam wrong? I think not.--Doneve (talk) 20:32, 29 October 2013 (PDT)
- If you look on Wikipedia, you'll see that section headings have a hairline that covers the width of the page. I do think it makes the article more readable. Any thoughts on adopting this here? --Scaletail (talk) 20:09, 30 October 2013 (PDT)
- I would prefer to keep the previous layout, where two equals (==) are used for headings. This corresponds with an H2 HTML tag. One equal (=) is a H1 HTML tag, which should be reserved for the page title. Nicjansma (talk) 08:15, 7 November 2013 (PST)
- If you look on Wikipedia, you'll see that section headings have a hairline that covers the width of the page. I do think it makes the article more readable. Any thoughts on adopting this here? --Scaletail (talk) 20:09, 30 October 2013 (PDT)
- There is no problem, we can change the headings size for the new layout, but a admin must do this, oh Bob the arcticle name size and the new heading size is the same, or iam wrong? I think not.--Doneve (talk) 20:32, 29 October 2013 (PDT)