Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mbear"

Line 13: Line 13:
 
:::No problem. I '''am''' publicly humiliated. I guess that'll teach me to try to use logic and real world systems to try to fill in the gaps in a weapon system's history. ;) --[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 04:37, 7 January 2013 (PST)
 
:::No problem. I '''am''' publicly humiliated. I guess that'll teach me to try to use logic and real world systems to try to fill in the gaps in a weapon system's history. ;) --[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 04:37, 7 January 2013 (PST)
 
:::Oh, and while I'm at it, what a way to start the week. Having someone tell you your work is complete crap is a great way to suck the wind out of your sails.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 05:12, 7 January 2013 (PST)
 
:::Oh, and while I'm at it, what a way to start the week. Having someone tell you your work is complete crap is a great way to suck the wind out of your sails.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 05:12, 7 January 2013 (PST)
 +
::::Don't let it eat at you - Paul may have told you off, but when a bollocking's done, it's done. Mistakes are bound to happen here; there are only, what, half a dozen of us regularly editing? And from what I've seen, we're all running around with our collective hair on fire trying to get information uploaded, rather than busily checking each other's homework. You do good work - don't let this get to you, ok? [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 23:35, 7 January 2013 (PST)

Revision as of 03:35, 8 January 2013

Something you want to say? Just let me know!

Archived

Cruise Missile 120

'nuff said. Consider yourself flogged and thoroughly publicly humiliated. :) Good Conduct Award, 1st ribbon

On a more serious note, I am somewhat disappointed with myself over the "apocryphal" tags on the Objective Raids, Luthien, and 1st Ed. Periphery sourcebooks. I did notice them being added and knew it was wrong, but then it somehow dropped off my radar. Fixed now. Frabby (talk) 04:18, 5 January 2013 (PST)

It may be because you and I had a conversation over how the wording in the apocryphal template doesn't match the intent you had for it, after I argued that the wording on the apocryphal content template matched what Herb had said about the three books. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 10:52, 5 January 2013 (PST)
Bing! That was it! Thanks for the reminder, I'll add it to my to-do list. Frabby (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2013 (PST)
No problem. I am publicly humiliated. I guess that'll teach me to try to use logic and real world systems to try to fill in the gaps in a weapon system's history. ;) --Mbear(talk) 04:37, 7 January 2013 (PST)
Oh, and while I'm at it, what a way to start the week. Having someone tell you your work is complete crap is a great way to suck the wind out of your sails.--Mbear(talk) 05:12, 7 January 2013 (PST)
Don't let it eat at you - Paul may have told you off, but when a bollocking's done, it's done. Mistakes are bound to happen here; there are only, what, half a dozen of us regularly editing? And from what I've seen, we're all running around with our collective hair on fire trying to get information uploaded, rather than busily checking each other's homework. You do good work - don't let this get to you, ok? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 23:35, 7 January 2013 (PST)