Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Inner Sphere Standard BattleMechs"
Sarna News
(Created page with " I would think IS General Battlemechs and IS Battlemechs would be distinct subsets; with IS General covering mechs available to all factions and IS Battlemechs covering all me...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I would think IS General Battlemechs and IS Battlemechs would be distinct subsets; with IS General covering mechs available to all factions and IS Battlemechs covering all mechs including faction specific ones. | + | I would think IS General Battlemechs and IS Battlemechs would be distinct subsets; with IS General covering mechs available to all factions and IS Battlemechs covering all mechs including faction specific ones.{{Unsigned|73.140.154.170}} |
| + | :The issue is that the BattleMech faction categories are not meant to be an availability chart, they are who manufactures the BattleMechs, so "General BattleMechs" simply does not exist. For a real world analogy, A Toyota Camry does not stop being considered a Japanese car because you can buy one in America or Europe.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 13:20, 20 February 2021 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:20, 20 February 2021
I would think IS General Battlemechs and IS Battlemechs would be distinct subsets; with IS General covering mechs available to all factions and IS Battlemechs covering all mechs including faction specific ones.— The preceding unsigned comment was posted by 73.140.154.170 (talk • contribs) .
- The issue is that the BattleMech faction categories are not meant to be an availability chart, they are who manufactures the BattleMechs, so "General BattleMechs" simply does not exist. For a real world analogy, A Toyota Camry does not stop being considered a Japanese car because you can buy one in America or Europe.--Dmon (talk) 13:20, 20 February 2021 (EST)