Talk:Kell Hounds

This article is within the scope of the Military Commands WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of articles on military units. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

1st & 2nd Regiments

I have question. Should there be seperate listings for the 1st & 2nd Regiments? The article as it stands is more organization information than individual regiments. Question, should individual unit articles be made? - Wrangler 18:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Only if there is a need. As far as I know, we've made no policy that the size of the unit dictates the merit of an article, only the relevance of the unit does. If the history and unit description can best be presented in the totality of the overall unit (Kell Hounds), then there is no need for individual unit articles (2nd Regiment). However, if 2nd Regiment warrants its own article, then by all means...--Revanche ^{(talk|contribs)} 21:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

I would like for the regiments to be split with a "Kell Hounds" article for the units history and then "1st Kell Hounds Regiment, 2nd Kell Hounds Regiment" etc for details of the units organization, equipment and officers. I have the same feelings about all the large multi-regiment units. --Dmon 23:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Revanche. If there is information to warrant articles on each regiment specifically, then go for it, but don't just create the article to create it. --Scaletail 00:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)