Difference between revisions of "Talk:Roughneck"
Sarna News
(Signing) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Might want to keep an eye on the model prefix. While the lore article uses the "RGK" prefix, the [https://mwomercs.com/roughneck sale page] and [https://mwomercs.com/forums/topic/240510-roughneck-faq/ FAQ] both use the "RGH" designation. | Might want to keep an eye on the model prefix. While the lore article uses the "RGK" prefix, the [https://mwomercs.com/roughneck sale page] and [https://mwomercs.com/forums/topic/240510-roughneck-faq/ FAQ] both use the "RGH" designation. | ||
| − | Also built them in Skunkwerks, and the 1A's cost comes to 5,209,573 c-bills. | + | Also built them in Skunkwerks, and the 1A's cost comes to 5,209,573 c-bills. [[Special:Contributions/68.51.25.163|68.51.25.163]] 19:35, 3 December 2016 (PST) |
Revision as of 23:35, 3 December 2016
In short
Roughneck: https://mwomercs.com/roughneck
Non-canon Heavy Mech created by PGI for the MechWarrior Online.
Discussion
Thanks for writing article for this mech, Cyc :) --ManganMan (talk) 15:09, 3 December 2016 (PST)
Loader King?
I am not familiar with the Loader King am I right in thinking that they have actually added two 'Mechs to the BTu in one fell swoop?--Dmon (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2016 (PST)
- Correct. Technical Readout: Vehicle Annex mentions Achernar make multiple IndustrialMechs and the naming format matches the Dig King, but cannot locate it being specifically mentioned before.Cyc (talk) 19:03, 3 December 2016 (PST)
Model Designation
Might want to keep an eye on the model prefix. While the lore article uses the "RGK" prefix, the sale page and FAQ both use the "RGH" designation.
Also built them in Skunkwerks, and the 1A's cost comes to 5,209,573 c-bills. 68.51.25.163 19:35, 3 December 2016 (PST)