Difference between revisions of "Talk:Roughneck"
m (→Loader King?) |
(→Loader King?: No other mention prior to Roughneck) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
===Loader King?=== | ===Loader King?=== | ||
I am not familiar with the [[Loader King]] am I right in thinking that they have actually added two 'Mechs to the BTu in one fell swoop?--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 18:29, 3 December 2016 (PST) | I am not familiar with the [[Loader King]] am I right in thinking that they have actually added two 'Mechs to the BTu in one fell swoop?--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 18:29, 3 December 2016 (PST) | ||
+ | :Correct. [[Technical Readout: Vehicle Annex]] mentions Achernar make multiple IndustrialMechs and the naming format matches the [[Dig King]], but cannot locate it being specifically mentioned before.[[User:Cyc|Cyc]] ([[User talk:Cyc|talk]]) 19:03, 3 December 2016 (PST) |
Revision as of 23:03, 3 December 2016
In short
Roughneck: https://mwomercs.com/roughneck
Non-canon Heavy Mech created by PGI for the MechWarrior Online.
Discussion
Thanks for writing article for this mech, Cyc :) --ManganMan (talk) 15:09, 3 December 2016 (PST)
Loader King?
I am not familiar with the Loader King am I right in thinking that they have actually added two 'Mechs to the BTu in one fell swoop?--Dmon (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2016 (PST)
- Correct. Technical Readout: Vehicle Annex mentions Achernar make multiple IndustrialMechs and the naming format matches the Dig King, but cannot locate it being specifically mentioned before.Cyc (talk) 19:03, 3 December 2016 (PST)