User talk:ArkRoyalRavager
Contents
Welcome
Brian Cache
Hy great content to the Brian Cache, but please add references or ref. notes to the article for concistence, thanks.--Doneve 06:36, 20 March 2012 (PDT)
Hi sorry I rarely see my chat section. Ok will keep it in mind. Thank you for the feedback! --User:ArkRoyalRavager
FM 3145
Sorry guys I didn't realize the FM3145 moratorium till I edited some of the articles. After reading through this wiki's moratorium policy which says the source can be used 2 months after being published, and since FM3145 came out in mid-September, it's alright to use it as a souce now right? --User:ArkRoyalRavager
- Wrong. We are waiting for the printed FM:3145. Do not post anything from FM:3145! --Aldous (talk) 08:22, 9 December 2013 (PST)
- Err... Could you undo everything you've done? Thanks.--Aldous (talk) 08:35, 9 December 2013 (PST)
- The moratorium expired on February 18, 2014.--Doneve (talk) 11:30, 9 December 2013 (PST)
- We measure moratorium dates from the publication of the print book, where applicable. Moratorium dates are listed on the article for the book/product. In this case, FM:3145 has a street date of December 18th, so we have just a bit over two months to wait. --Scaletail (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2013 (PST)
- Ok. Will remove them till February 18th.--User:ArkRoyalRavager
- We measure moratorium dates from the publication of the print book, where applicable. Moratorium dates are listed on the article for the book/product. In this case, FM:3145 has a street date of December 18th, so we have just a bit over two months to wait. --Scaletail (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2013 (PST)
- The moratorium expired on February 18, 2014.--Doneve (talk) 11:30, 9 December 2013 (PST)
- Err... Could you undo everything you've done? Thanks.--Aldous (talk) 08:35, 9 December 2013 (PST)
The AFFS
If you can let me know what you're trying to do with the Armed Forces of the Federated Suns page, I may be able to give you a hand with the formatting and the like - at the moment, you've got some really weird formatting layouts going on. Drop me a note here or on my talk page and I'll help if I can ... BrokenMnemonic (talk) 14:04, 9 December 2013 (PST)
- Why you remove some headers?.--Doneve (talk) 14:26, 9 December 2013 (PST)
- I was trying to create a section for the Independent Commands brigade due to the AFFS commonly lumping them under that brigade in the field manuals. Also, the brigade is the most fluid due to different units being added or deactivated or eventually forming their own separate brigade(like the Federated Suns Lancers). --User:ArkRoyalRavager
- OK - I can help with that. How many units have served as independent commands, while still being AFFS units rather than hired mercenaries? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 11:20, 10 December 2013 (PST)
- 1st Aragon Borderers, 1st Argyle Lancers, 1st Capellan Dragoons, 1st Federated Suns Armored Cavalry, 2nd Federated Suns Armored Cavalry, 1st Federated Suns Lancers(eventually formed its own Federated Suns Lancers brigade), 1st Kestrel Grenadiers, 1st Kittery Borderers, 1st Royal Cavaliers - these are the units in the Independent Commands from 3025-3085. User:ArkRoyalRavager
- I've been reading through the AFFS page, and a lot of those units are listed under the "Inactive Brigades" sub-section. However, I'm not overly convinced the page as a whole is in the best layout, because it's very much linked to being a sitrep as at the end of 3067, with some additions from later detail. I think what might be best is to wait until Field Report: 2765 AFFS is out to see how many of those units listed as brigades on the AFFS page currently actually really were brigades. Then, the page can be rewritten to make it less time-bounded and more general, with a section on Independent Commands if needed. Does that sound reasonable? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 00:43, 12 December 2013 (PST)
- Great idea. Will do. Thanks BrokenMnemonic. User:ArkRoyalRavager
- Happy to help I'm looking forward to seeing the new WarShips and formation details from FR 2765: AFFS. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 06:14, 13 December 2013 (PST)
- Great idea. Will do. Thanks BrokenMnemonic. User:ArkRoyalRavager
- I've been reading through the AFFS page, and a lot of those units are listed under the "Inactive Brigades" sub-section. However, I'm not overly convinced the page as a whole is in the best layout, because it's very much linked to being a sitrep as at the end of 3067, with some additions from later detail. I think what might be best is to wait until Field Report: 2765 AFFS is out to see how many of those units listed as brigades on the AFFS page currently actually really were brigades. Then, the page can be rewritten to make it less time-bounded and more general, with a section on Independent Commands if needed. Does that sound reasonable? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 00:43, 12 December 2013 (PST)
- 1st Aragon Borderers, 1st Argyle Lancers, 1st Capellan Dragoons, 1st Federated Suns Armored Cavalry, 2nd Federated Suns Armored Cavalry, 1st Federated Suns Lancers(eventually formed its own Federated Suns Lancers brigade), 1st Kestrel Grenadiers, 1st Kittery Borderers, 1st Royal Cavaliers - these are the units in the Independent Commands from 3025-3085. User:ArkRoyalRavager
- OK - I can help with that. How many units have served as independent commands, while still being AFFS units rather than hired mercenaries? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 11:20, 10 December 2013 (PST)
- I was trying to create a section for the Independent Commands brigade due to the AFFS commonly lumping them under that brigade in the field manuals. Also, the brigade is the most fluid due to different units being added or deactivated or eventually forming their own separate brigade(like the Federated Suns Lancers). --User:ArkRoyalRavager