Difference between revisions of "User talk:Pserratv"
Sarna News
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Hello. Are there any canon sources that specify the logo for the [[Arms of Thor]] unit? The artwork referenced in ''[[Maximum Tech]]'' is in the section for the [[Command Console]] only. Also, the color image technically is fan art, being reconstructed and colorized by a member of the BattleTech forums. --[[User:Cache|Cache]] ([[User talk:Cache|talk]]) 19:31, 13 January 2019 (EST) | Hello. Are there any canon sources that specify the logo for the [[Arms of Thor]] unit? The artwork referenced in ''[[Maximum Tech]]'' is in the section for the [[Command Console]] only. Also, the color image technically is fan art, being reconstructed and colorized by a member of the BattleTech forums. --[[User:Cache|Cache]] ([[User talk:Cache|talk]]) 19:31, 13 January 2019 (EST) | ||
:None other to my knowledge. I did indeed take that from this person In think.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 06:45, 14 January 2019 (EST) | :None other to my knowledge. I did indeed take that from this person In think.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 06:45, 14 January 2019 (EST) | ||
| + | :: Sorry to butt in (and late), but fan art ''fan-created'' art is official, if it is a quality improvement upon the available source image. For example, if the source image is only b&w, and someone can re-create it with indicated colors, then it is allowed. However, if no logo has ever been depicted--nor described--then this would not apply.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 17:09, 4 February 2019 (EST) | ||
==HexPack rollbacks== | ==HexPack rollbacks== | ||
Hi Pere, I rolled back your edits to the Hex Pack pages because they were... wrong. The Classic BT Introduction Box Set you linked is a 2007 product that has nothing to do with the 25 Anniversary edition or the subsequent non-anniversary edition of the boxed set that I meant (with, I'm told, much better quality miniatures) and for which we curiously seem to be missing an article. That's something I need to look into. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 12:41, 4 February 2019 (EST) | Hi Pere, I rolled back your edits to the Hex Pack pages because they were... wrong. The Classic BT Introduction Box Set you linked is a 2007 product that has nothing to do with the 25 Anniversary edition or the subsequent non-anniversary edition of the boxed set that I meant (with, I'm told, much better quality miniatures) and for which we curiously seem to be missing an article. That's something I need to look into. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 12:41, 4 February 2019 (EST) | ||
:I thought they were all the same.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 12:49, 4 February 2019 (EST) | :I thought they were all the same.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 12:49, 4 February 2019 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:09, 4 February 2019
Archives
Current
Arms of Thor Logo
Hello. Are there any canon sources that specify the logo for the Arms of Thor unit? The artwork referenced in Maximum Tech is in the section for the Command Console only. Also, the color image technically is fan art, being reconstructed and colorized by a member of the BattleTech forums. --Cache (talk) 19:31, 13 January 2019 (EST)
- None other to my knowledge. I did indeed take that from this person In think.--Pserratv (talk) 06:45, 14 January 2019 (EST)
- Sorry to butt in (and late), but fan art fan-created art is official, if it is a quality improvement upon the available source image. For example, if the source image is only b&w, and someone can re-create it with indicated colors, then it is allowed. However, if no logo has ever been depicted--nor described--then this would not apply.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 17:09, 4 February 2019 (EST)
HexPack rollbacks
Hi Pere, I rolled back your edits to the Hex Pack pages because they were... wrong. The Classic BT Introduction Box Set you linked is a 2007 product that has nothing to do with the 25 Anniversary edition or the subsequent non-anniversary edition of the boxed set that I meant (with, I'm told, much better quality miniatures) and for which we curiously seem to be missing an article. That's something I need to look into. Frabby (talk) 12:41, 4 February 2019 (EST)