Difference between revisions of "User talk:ClanWolverine101"
(420 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
* [[Special:UserScore|Edit Counter]]
 
* [[Special:UserScore|Edit Counter]]
 
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive Making|Archive Making]]
 
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive Making|Archive Making]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Setting Up a Redirect|Setting Up a Redirect]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/External Links|External Links]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/main|"Main" article link in a subsection, alternative name]]
 
* [[Special:Contributions/ClanWolverine101|My Contributions]]
 
* [[Special:Contributions/ClanWolverine101|My Contributions]]
 +
* [[Wolf's Dragoons battles|Neuling's Wolf's Dragoons battles article]]
 +
* [[Wolfs Dragoon - 4th Succssion War|Neuling's 4SW Wolf's Dragoons battles article]]
 +
* [[Template talk:Update Needed|Frabby's Update Needed Discussion]]
 +
* [[BattleTechWiki:Project Unfinished Book/JTP:New Avalon/Unwelcome Guests|Unfinished Book - JTP:New Avalon]]
 +
* [[User:Mbear/PlanetPageTest|Conflict Infobox]]
  
 
== Archives ==
 
== Archives ==
 
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2010|2010 Archive]]
 
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2010|2010 Archive]]
 
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2011|2011 Archive]]
 
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2011|2011 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2012|2012 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2013|2013 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2014|2014 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2015|2015 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2016|2016 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2017|2017 Archive]]
  
−
==Emperor==
+
== 2017 Year in Review ==
−
Morning by myself or evening by you ;), please can you add a reference note to your last change on the article, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 20:03, 10 January 2012 (PST)
+
Hey - sorry i've been away. I've got caught up in some other games that have captured my creative interests. I'm hoping something re-ignites my interest in CBT in the coming year. Regardless, i'm proud of what people have accomplished with Sarna. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 02:42, 4 January 2018 (EST)
−
: Good point. Done. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 20:19, 10 January 2012 (PST)
 
  
−
==LCAF==
+
== Profession box position shortening ==
−
Please  explain to me what have you changed at the page, then I can decide. Tnx [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 12:56, 11 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
:I haven't changed nothing important only better copies of the pictures and make the smaller by |150px. That are the only chances. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 13:03, 11 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
::Oh, I see it now. Thanks. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 22:52, 11 January 2012 (PST)
 
  
−
==Archive==
+
Hey CW,
−
#Create a page named [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive1]]. "Archive1" can be any name you want.
 
−
#Copy all posts from your talk page (by opening the "edit" tab).
 
−
#Paste the posts on the Archive1 page.
 
−
#Save Archive1.
 
−
#Delete the copied posts from your talk page.
 
−
#Add a link to Archive1 at the top of your talk page. (ex:<nowiki>  *[[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive1|Archive1]]</nowiki>)
 
−
I think this little guide help.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 13:42, 11 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
: Thanks! [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 14:16, 11 January 2012 (PST)
 
  
−
==Neuling==
+
I have just reverted your edit to the [[Elizabeth Nichole]] article and thought I should explain my thinking. A characters overview it should be pointed out that they are a Colonel in a mercenary command (and name said command) but I feel the infobox has no discernible need for the ''mercenary'' appellation since her affiliation is stated as [[Wolf's Dragoons]] directly above in the affiliation box via a wikilink. At the level of a Colonel it is a minor quibble but a lot of the better known characters and state leaders infobox's become quite unwieldy so I am trying to set a precedent of being short and concise.
−
Hy CW, i think you saw Neuling's new creations, i dont know why he ignoring our reference policy, as example ''House Steiner'' refered as source ,i don't know i indicate this as the [[House Steiner]] and not the sourcebook [[House Steiner (The Lyran Commonwealth)]], i know its the source but other users don't know this, i talk so offten to him, and iam become really pissd of, he don't follow talks to him by help links etc., i don't disagree his work  but the most is throwing in, and the most don't follow our wiki standard, i don't know what i can do, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 11:16, 14 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
: I agree. His references are a complete mess on most of these "articles" he is putting together as well. I would suggest taking it to Frabby. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 15:35, 14 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
::Thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 16:09, 14 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
::: Please take a look on Dmons talk page, i give a updated statement.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 16:57, 14 January 2012 (PST)
 
  
 +
[[Archon-Prince]] of the [[Federated Commonwealth]] or [[saKhan]] of [[Clan Smoke Jaguar]] are perfect examples of titles that can be shortened without sacrificing information.
  
−
==Plagarism and Apolyze==
+
As a side note it is on my to do list to eventually make faction specific Khan / saKhan articled as part of my [[:Category:Titles and Positions]] project but it is a way off at the moment.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 05:57, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
−
Hello Clan Wolverine I read your message that you wrote at Frappy page. I agree that I make mistakes in the past and apolyze to you and all the other admins. Please tell me which content is considered as plagarism and I will blanke the page immedatly and you can delete it later. I thought my work had improved to that level that is was accepted for that page but I was wrong. When necessary I will delete all my contributions to that site with the goal not to harm you. I await you awnser. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 08:46, 18 January 2012 (PST)
+
:Dmon - I'm not sure i agree with that application, but if that is how we are doing it now, i understand. 09:08, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
−
:I had corrected all Objectiv Raids to Objective Raids that I could find with the search option. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 08:48, 18 January 2012 (PST)
+
::If you disagree feel free to propose a different method, and if I think it is better I will adopt that instead. My primary objective is to try and bring all character infobox's to a common standard and methodology.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 09:52, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
−
::Please continue this discussion at [[User talk:Frabby#Have I made you admins angry?|my talk page]], so that it isn't spread over several different pages. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 11:22, 18 January 2012 (PST)
 
  
−
==3rd Davion Guards==
+
== Irwin Tyrell ==
−
Hy CW, i can't found any info in [[Objective Raids]] of the [[3rd Davion Guards]], can you give me a page number, or i have tomatos on my eyes, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 09:14, 19 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
:Hello Doneve, you can find the information at page 19 in Objective Raids at the Ford Theater. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 10:37, 19 January 2012 (PST)
 
  
−
==Underconstruction==
+
[[Irwin Tyrell]] is up. First new article in... a rather long time. Its nice to be back. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 17:58, 8 August 2019 (EDT)
−
I used the underconstruction banner to inform the user that changes to the site will happen. In my case it will be the addition of the different compositions from 3040 - 3050 - 3054 - 3059 til 3064 (it depends on the entries of the corresponding field manual which year excatly) 3067 - 3079. When you think it is unnecessary I will remove the banner and will also not include the underconstruction in my future addtions.[[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 11:08, 20 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
: Will these compositions match the format used elsewhere? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 13:43, 20 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
:: No he don't match, but i fell i become a cleanup whore, to fix Neulings contributions.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 13:47, 20 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
::: Okay, Doneve let me know if i can help. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 15:21, 20 January 2012 (PST)
 
  
−
==????==
+
== Neil Parella ==
−
Thanks for your support i appriciate this, but i think i stopp some talk to 1-2 members, your are not one of this (and some longe time memberships), we had a really good hand in hand work, but my question is? Why don't follow some members the wiki standard, we invest a lot of time to make sarna better and bring it up to one standard, i don't understand this, talk talk talk, and it bring's nothing, why we have a policy, and WikiProject talk page, i hope i'am not to raw of my writing, but i think you understand me, at my first steps on sarna i was blocked by Scaletail, but i follow Revs instructions and he bring me to this what i do on sarna and what i do on the wiki, i had  Scaltail's view, talk, when you not talk to me and don't match any policy i undo this revisons, he was a good teacher, i set up a talk to Rev, i hope he correspondence when he found time.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 15:22, 21 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
: I understand, Doneve. I'm hoping things will get better as Rev is able to devote more time to the wiki. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 00:20, 22 January 2012 (PST)
 
  
−
== Critique of ''Armed Forces of the Federated Commonwealth'' revision ==
+
[[Neil Parella]] is up. I love Robert Chareette characters. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 21:36, 22 August 2019 (EDT)
  
−
Hey, CW101: I normally don't respond to talk page comments on the originator's talkpage, but since I've been off-site for a bit, I thought it appropriate to let you know I've written about your revisions here: [[Talk:Armed_Forces_of_the_Federated_Commonwealth]]. Thanks. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 04:41, 21 January 2012 (PST)
+
== Zoomer - new article ==
  
−
==House Kurita Pics==
+
The [[Zoomer]] is up. This one is tricky, since it doesn't have statistics or even a proper name. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 19:42, 26 August 2019 (EDT)
−
Hy, have this link [[Temporary kurita gallery]], when you create new House Kurita articles you have a litte gallery to use the images, Neuling uploaded all, and i added the pics to the articles, take a look on the Kurita bios, i removed some links from the gallery when i added it to the bios.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 13:27, 23 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
: Thanks! [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 20:15, 23 January 2012 (PST)
 
  
−
==Fluff writing==
+
==Military affiliations==
−
Hy CW can you take a look on the [[Jalastar Aerospace]] page, i started with minor fluff writing, and want some critical response, if its ok, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 17:45, 25 January 2012 (PST)
+
Hi ClanWolverine, I don't think we've met yet but I've seen lots of your work over the years and respect your contributions to the wiki. I just want to ask about some mass tweaks you've been recently making to character articles such as [[https://www.sarna.net/wiki/index.php?title=Ethan_Kuhn&diff=prev&oldid=1065336 this one]]. While in most cases you're not wrong (there have been a few that you accidentally attributed to the wrong state/military), I feel like it's bloating the article leads with somewhat redundant information. Nearly every military character in the FedSuns or Lyran Commonwealth who lived around the mid-31st century will have been associated with 2 or 3 militaries if not more. The characters are already linked to their factions in the infobox and categories, and if a user clicks on the commands they were assigned to, they'll see further associations there. Do you have any particular rationale for putting it in there? Thanks, [[User:Csdavis715|Csdavis715]] ([[User talk:Csdavis715|talk]]) 04:11, 4 April 2024 (EDT)
−
 
 
−
==Composition Updates==
 
−
Hy Clan Wolverine, I will know if my formating is accepted by the other user for the composition section of the unit articles. Please give me your response about it. Tnx [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 10:47, 29 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
: Give me an example. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 10:50, 29 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
::Example: one [[17th Benjamin Regulars]] and two [[Davion Assault Guards]] [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 10:53, 29 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
:::The one for the Davion Assault Guards is okay with me, although I think too many indents were used. (That's an aesthetic issue.)
 
−
:::Regarding the Galedon Regulars, what you put for 3025 really doesn't add anything to the article, and cannot be referenced anyway. Yes, we may assume that the 17th used the standard organization structure at the time, but there is no reference used. People know what a "standard 'Mech regiment" is. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 13:41, 29 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
::::I doesn't follow your argumentation because it stands exactly that the DCMS used for mech commands the regiment (House Kurita (The Draconis Combine) p.123 second column) structure and in the deployment table were two commands noted. The strength of the prefecture garrison count two. My thought is two commands = two regiment => every command equals 1 regiment (House Kurita (The Draconis Combine) p.137 "Kajikazawa Prefecture") and to finsish my argumentation the command is described as a heavy unit(House Kurita (The Draconis Combine) p.146). [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 14:10, 29 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
:::::Neuling - First of all, you are making a lot of assumptions. You are assuming the 17th didn't have any armor/infantry elements attached, something that was quite common even with DCMS regular units. Second, you cite the deployment tables. That means nothing. Deployment tables don't indicate exact size/composition. Deployment Tables from these (and most other books) exclusively refer to battlemech regiments. Third, just because the HK book presents the standard Kurita 'mech regiment structure doesn't mean that's what was precisely used. Finally, presenting a breakdown to the company level contributes nothing to the wiki. You don't know what nicknames (if any) those companies had, and you don't even know for the battalions. Because of this, you should scale back and present the material at the regimental level instead of presenting mere speculation. Thank you. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 16:23, 29 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
::::::Clan Wolverine, you doing me wrong for the entry of 3028. The entries for the single companies exits before I made my update of the composition. Take alook at the revision history - Version vom 30. december 2010, 04:21 Uhr - Dmon. I will think about it and provide the entry with an good formating. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 02:43, 30 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
:::::::Fair enough. I apologize for that. I still think the company breakdown should be removed. I also think if solid info doesn't exist for a specific year (3067?) it should simply be stripped out. Also: When you say there are "Nine heavy companies" that's not quite accurate. We know that it is considered a heavy regiment. A more precise breakdown is unavailable? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 07:11, 30 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
::::::::When I consider the entries of 3059 with the entries of 3067 I see clear differences. For me the technology level are solid informations. Within the seven years some of the commanders changed. And take for an example the the [[Davion Assault Guards]]. The command could rise its expierence level to Elite. I think that is the work worth.[[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 07:37, 30 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
:::::::::My point is if there is no significant new material, it looks rather sparse. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 09:34, 30 January 2012 (PST)
 
−
::::::::::You hit the nail :)--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 19:48, 4 February 2012 (PST)
 

Revision as of 04:12, 4 April 2024

My own tools

Archives

2017 Year in Review

Hey - sorry i've been away. I've got caught up in some other games that have captured my creative interests. I'm hoping something re-ignites my interest in CBT in the coming year. Regardless, i'm proud of what people have accomplished with Sarna. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 02:42, 4 January 2018 (EST)

Profession box position shortening

Hey CW,

I have just reverted your edit to the Elizabeth Nichole article and thought I should explain my thinking. A characters overview it should be pointed out that they are a Colonel in a mercenary command (and name said command) but I feel the infobox has no discernible need for the mercenary appellation since her affiliation is stated as Wolf's Dragoons directly above in the affiliation box via a wikilink. At the level of a Colonel it is a minor quibble but a lot of the better known characters and state leaders infobox's become quite unwieldy so I am trying to set a precedent of being short and concise.

Archon-Prince of the Federated Commonwealth or saKhan of Clan Smoke Jaguar are perfect examples of titles that can be shortened without sacrificing information.

As a side note it is on my to do list to eventually make faction specific Khan / saKhan articled as part of my Category:Titles and Positions project but it is a way off at the moment.--Dmon (talk) 05:57, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

Dmon - I'm not sure i agree with that application, but if that is how we are doing it now, i understand. 09:08, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
If you disagree feel free to propose a different method, and if I think it is better I will adopt that instead. My primary objective is to try and bring all character infobox's to a common standard and methodology.--Dmon (talk) 09:52, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

Irwin Tyrell

Irwin Tyrell is up. First new article in... a rather long time. Its nice to be back. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 17:58, 8 August 2019 (EDT)

Neil Parella

Neil Parella is up. I love Robert Chareette characters. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 21:36, 22 August 2019 (EDT)

Zoomer - new article

The Zoomer is up. This one is tricky, since it doesn't have statistics or even a proper name. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 19:42, 26 August 2019 (EDT)

Military affiliations

Hi ClanWolverine, I don't think we've met yet but I've seen lots of your work over the years and respect your contributions to the wiki. I just want to ask about some mass tweaks you've been recently making to character articles such as [this one]. While in most cases you're not wrong (there have been a few that you accidentally attributed to the wrong state/military), I feel like it's bloating the article leads with somewhat redundant information. Nearly every military character in the FedSuns or Lyran Commonwealth who lived around the mid-31st century will have been associated with 2 or 3 militaries if not more. The characters are already linked to their factions in the infobox and categories, and if a user clicks on the commands they were assigned to, they'll see further associations there. Do you have any particular rationale for putting it in there? Thanks, Csdavis715 (talk) 04:11, 4 April 2024 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://www.sarna.net/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:ClanWolverine101&oldid=1065337"