Difference between revisions of "User talk:ClanWolverine101"

(846 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Welcome|ClanWolverine101|}}
+
__TOC__
  
== Sign ==
+
== My own tools ==
 +
* [[Special:UserScore|Edit Counter]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive Making|Archive Making]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Setting Up a Redirect|Setting Up a Redirect]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/External Links|External Links]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/main|"Main" article link in a subsection, alternative name]]
 +
* [[Special:Contributions/ClanWolverine101|My Contributions]]
 +
* [[Wolf's Dragoons battles|Neuling's Wolf's Dragoons battles article]]
 +
* [[Wolfs Dragoon - 4th Succssion War|Neuling's 4SW Wolf's Dragoons battles article]]
 +
* [[Template talk:Update Needed|Frabby's Update Needed Discussion]]
 +
* [[BattleTechWiki:Project Unfinished Book/JTP:New Avalon/Unwelcome Guests|Unfinished Book - JTP:New Avalon]]
 +
* [[User:Mbear/PlanetPageTest|Conflict Infobox]]
  
{{Sign}}
+
== Archives ==
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2010|2010 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2011|2011 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2012|2012 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2013|2013 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2014|2014 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2015|2015 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2016|2016 Archive]]
 +
* [[User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2017|2017 Archive]]
  
:ClanWolverine101, please /do/ sign your comments on talk pages. If you don't, someone (usually me), has to do the research to find out who it was that made the comment. Thank you. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 05:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
+
== 2017 Year in Review ==
 +
Hey - sorry i've been away. I've got caught up in some other games that have captured my creative interests. I'm hoping something re-ignites my interest in CBT in the coming year. Regardless, i'm proud of what people have accomplished with Sarna. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 02:42, 4 January 2018 (EST)
  
::Apologies - I missed the appropriate command to do so. I'll reread your protocols. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]]
+
== Profession box position shortening ==
  
== Cosara Weaponries ==
+
Hey CW,
  
Evening, ClanWolverine101. I saw your removal of the statement regarding [[Cosara Weaponries]] from the [[Northwind Highlanders]] article. Because I don't want to discourage a new Editor, especially one working so hard as you, I'm not gonna dispute that, but it is generally our policy to post a '''<nowiki>{{citation needed}}</nowiki>''' tag after something that doesn't seem right to you. That way, multiple Editors have the opportunity to research the fact, rather than just losing the information. If someone hasn't updated the statement with a verifiable citation, then you are free to delete it. That tag, and others, can be found in the left-side column in the [[Help:Template gallery|Template gallery]]. Thanks. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 02:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
+
I have just reverted your edit to the [[Elizabeth Nichole]] article and thought I should explain my thinking. A characters overview it should be pointed out that they are a Colonel in a mercenary command (and name said command) but I feel the infobox has no discernible need for the ''mercenary'' appellation since her affiliation is stated as [[Wolf's Dragoons]] directly above in the affiliation box via a wikilink. At the level of a Colonel it is a minor quibble but a lot of the better known characters and state leaders infobox's become quite unwieldy so I am trying to set a precedent of being short and concise.
  
:Understood, and thank you. I started having second thoughts about my original note, thinking maybe it was in regards to the Cosara factories on Terra, not Northwind that I was thinking of. Regardless, I would not have zapped it arbitrarily if it had been someone else's posting.[[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]]
+
[[Archon-Prince]] of the [[Federated Commonwealth]] or [[saKhan]] of [[Clan Smoke Jaguar]] are perfect examples of titles that can be shortened without sacrificing information.
  
::{{Emoticon| :) }} Really? Good thing I didn't roll you back again. I didn't know you had posted it. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 04:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
+
As a side note it is on my to do list to eventually make faction specific Khan / saKhan articled as part of my [[:Category:Titles and Positions]] project but it is a way off at the moment.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 05:57, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
 +
:Dmon - I'm not sure i agree with that application, but if that is how we are doing it now, i understand. 09:08, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
 +
::If you disagree feel free to propose a different method, and if I think it is better I will adopt that instead. My primary objective is to try and bring all character infobox's to a common standard and methodology.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 09:52, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Irwin Tyrell ==
 +
 
 +
[[Irwin Tyrell]] is up. First new article in... a rather long time. Its nice to be back. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 17:58, 8 August 2019 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Neil Parella ==
 +
 
 +
[[Neil Parella]] is up. I love Robert Chareette characters. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 21:36, 22 August 2019 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Zoomer - new article ==
 +
 
 +
The [[Zoomer]] is up. This one is tricky, since it doesn't have statistics or even a proper name. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 19:42, 26 August 2019 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
==Military affiliations==
 +
Hi ClanWolverine, I don't think we've met yet but I've seen lots of your work over the years and respect your contributions to the wiki. I just want to ask about some mass tweaks you've been recently making to character articles such as [[https://www.sarna.net/wiki/index.php?title=Ethan_Kuhn&diff=prev&oldid=1065336 this one]]. While in most cases you're not wrong (there have been a few that you accidentally attributed to the wrong state/military), I feel like it's bloating the article leads with somewhat redundant information. Nearly every military character in the FedSuns or Lyran Commonwealth who lived around the mid-31st century will have been associated with 2 or 3 militaries if not more. The characters are already linked to their factions in the infobox and categories, and if a user clicks on the commands they were assigned to, they'll see further associations there. Do you have any particular rationale for putting it in there? Thanks, [[User:Csdavis715|Csdavis715]] ([[User talk:Csdavis715|talk]]) 04:11, 4 April 2024 (EDT)

Revision as of 04:12, 4 April 2024

My own tools

Archives

2017 Year in Review

Hey - sorry i've been away. I've got caught up in some other games that have captured my creative interests. I'm hoping something re-ignites my interest in CBT in the coming year. Regardless, i'm proud of what people have accomplished with Sarna. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 02:42, 4 January 2018 (EST)

Profession box position shortening

Hey CW,

I have just reverted your edit to the Elizabeth Nichole article and thought I should explain my thinking. A characters overview it should be pointed out that they are a Colonel in a mercenary command (and name said command) but I feel the infobox has no discernible need for the mercenary appellation since her affiliation is stated as Wolf's Dragoons directly above in the affiliation box via a wikilink. At the level of a Colonel it is a minor quibble but a lot of the better known characters and state leaders infobox's become quite unwieldy so I am trying to set a precedent of being short and concise.

Archon-Prince of the Federated Commonwealth or saKhan of Clan Smoke Jaguar are perfect examples of titles that can be shortened without sacrificing information.

As a side note it is on my to do list to eventually make faction specific Khan / saKhan articled as part of my Category:Titles and Positions project but it is a way off at the moment.--Dmon (talk) 05:57, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

Dmon - I'm not sure i agree with that application, but if that is how we are doing it now, i understand. 09:08, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
If you disagree feel free to propose a different method, and if I think it is better I will adopt that instead. My primary objective is to try and bring all character infobox's to a common standard and methodology.--Dmon (talk) 09:52, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

Irwin Tyrell

Irwin Tyrell is up. First new article in... a rather long time. Its nice to be back. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 17:58, 8 August 2019 (EDT)

Neil Parella

Neil Parella is up. I love Robert Chareette characters. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 21:36, 22 August 2019 (EDT)

Zoomer - new article

The Zoomer is up. This one is tricky, since it doesn't have statistics or even a proper name. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 19:42, 26 August 2019 (EDT)

Military affiliations

Hi ClanWolverine, I don't think we've met yet but I've seen lots of your work over the years and respect your contributions to the wiki. I just want to ask about some mass tweaks you've been recently making to character articles such as [this one]. While in most cases you're not wrong (there have been a few that you accidentally attributed to the wrong state/military), I feel like it's bloating the article leads with somewhat redundant information. Nearly every military character in the FedSuns or Lyran Commonwealth who lived around the mid-31st century will have been associated with 2 or 3 militaries if not more. The characters are already linked to their factions in the infobox and categories, and if a user clicks on the commands they were assigned to, they'll see further associations there. Do you have any particular rationale for putting it in there? Thanks, Csdavis715 (talk) 04:11, 4 April 2024 (EDT)