Difference between revisions of "User talk:ClanWolverine101"
(→Military affiliations: response) |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:Dmon - I'm not sure i agree with that application, but if that is how we are doing it now, i understand. 09:08, 2 August 2019 (EDT) | :Dmon - I'm not sure i agree with that application, but if that is how we are doing it now, i understand. 09:08, 2 August 2019 (EDT) | ||
::If you disagree feel free to propose a different method, and if I think it is better I will adopt that instead. My primary objective is to try and bring all character infobox's to a common standard and methodology.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 09:52, 2 August 2019 (EDT) | ::If you disagree feel free to propose a different method, and if I think it is better I will adopt that instead. My primary objective is to try and bring all character infobox's to a common standard and methodology.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 09:52, 2 August 2019 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Irwin Tyrell == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Irwin Tyrell]] is up. First new article in... a rather long time. Its nice to be back. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 17:58, 8 August 2019 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Neil Parella == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Neil Parella]] is up. I love Robert Chareette characters. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 21:36, 22 August 2019 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Zoomer - new article == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The [[Zoomer]] is up. This one is tricky, since it doesn't have statistics or even a proper name. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 19:42, 26 August 2019 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Military affiliations== | ||
+ | Hi ClanWolverine, I don't think we've met yet but I've seen lots of your work over the years and respect your contributions to the wiki. I just want to ask about some mass tweaks you've been recently making to character articles such as [[https://www.sarna.net/wiki/index.php?title=Ethan_Kuhn&diff=prev&oldid=1065336 this one]]. While in most cases you're not wrong (there have been a few that you accidentally attributed to the wrong state/military), I feel like it's bloating the article leads with somewhat redundant information. Nearly every military character in the FedSuns or Lyran Commonwealth who lived around the mid-31st century will have been associated with 2 or 3 militaries if not more. The characters are already linked to their factions in the infobox and categories, and if a user clicks on the commands they were assigned to, they'll see further associations there. Do you have any particular rationale for putting it in there? Thanks, [[User:Csdavis715|Csdavis715]] ([[User talk:Csdavis715|talk]]) 04:11, 4 April 2024 (EDT) | ||
+ | : Thank you for reaching out. I'm rather a sticker for details like that. The AFFC, at its peak, was distinct from the AFFS and the LCAF. I genuinely believe that it is important to add those tags where relevant. I realize they may feel redundant in some cases, but I feel it is an important distinction. The tag already existed, a | ||
+ | : If I tagged some characters in error, i do apologize. | ||
+ | : Is this an adequate explanation? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 23:42, 27 April 2024 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 23:43, 27 April 2024
Contents
My own tools[edit]
- Edit Counter
- Archive Making
- Setting Up a Redirect
- External Links
- "Main" article link in a subsection, alternative name
- My Contributions
- Neuling's Wolf's Dragoons battles article
- Neuling's 4SW Wolf's Dragoons battles article
- Frabby's Update Needed Discussion
- Unfinished Book - JTP:New Avalon
- Conflict Infobox
Archives[edit]
- 2010 Archive
- 2011 Archive
- 2012 Archive
- 2013 Archive
- 2014 Archive
- 2015 Archive
- 2016 Archive
- 2017 Archive
2017 Year in Review[edit]
Hey - sorry i've been away. I've got caught up in some other games that have captured my creative interests. I'm hoping something re-ignites my interest in CBT in the coming year. Regardless, i'm proud of what people have accomplished with Sarna. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 02:42, 4 January 2018 (EST)
Profession box position shortening[edit]
Hey CW,
I have just reverted your edit to the Elizabeth Nichole article and thought I should explain my thinking. A characters overview it should be pointed out that they are a Colonel in a mercenary command (and name said command) but I feel the infobox has no discernible need for the mercenary appellation since her affiliation is stated as Wolf's Dragoons directly above in the affiliation box via a wikilink. At the level of a Colonel it is a minor quibble but a lot of the better known characters and state leaders infobox's become quite unwieldy so I am trying to set a precedent of being short and concise.
Archon-Prince of the Federated Commonwealth or saKhan of Clan Smoke Jaguar are perfect examples of titles that can be shortened without sacrificing information.
As a side note it is on my to do list to eventually make faction specific Khan / saKhan articled as part of my Category:Titles and Positions project but it is a way off at the moment.--Dmon (talk) 05:57, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
- Dmon - I'm not sure i agree with that application, but if that is how we are doing it now, i understand. 09:08, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
Irwin Tyrell[edit]
Irwin Tyrell is up. First new article in... a rather long time. Its nice to be back. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 17:58, 8 August 2019 (EDT)
Neil Parella[edit]
Neil Parella is up. I love Robert Chareette characters. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 21:36, 22 August 2019 (EDT)
Zoomer - new article[edit]
The Zoomer is up. This one is tricky, since it doesn't have statistics or even a proper name. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 19:42, 26 August 2019 (EDT)
Military affiliations[edit]
Hi ClanWolverine, I don't think we've met yet but I've seen lots of your work over the years and respect your contributions to the wiki. I just want to ask about some mass tweaks you've been recently making to character articles such as [this one]. While in most cases you're not wrong (there have been a few that you accidentally attributed to the wrong state/military), I feel like it's bloating the article leads with somewhat redundant information. Nearly every military character in the FedSuns or Lyran Commonwealth who lived around the mid-31st century will have been associated with 2 or 3 militaries if not more. The characters are already linked to their factions in the infobox and categories, and if a user clicks on the commands they were assigned to, they'll see further associations there. Do you have any particular rationale for putting it in there? Thanks, Csdavis715 (talk) 04:11, 4 April 2024 (EDT)
- Thank you for reaching out. I'm rather a sticker for details like that. The AFFC, at its peak, was distinct from the AFFS and the LCAF. I genuinely believe that it is important to add those tags where relevant. I realize they may feel redundant in some cases, but I feel it is an important distinction. The tag already existed, a
- If I tagged some characters in error, i do apologize.
- Is this an adequate explanation? ClanWolverine101 (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2024 (EDT)